• العربية
  • فارسی
Brand
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • فارسی
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo

Iranian Psychiatrists Fight Judges' Verdict Against Actresses

Jul 20, 2023, 20:37 GMT+1Updated: 21:49 GMT+1
Iran's Chief Justice Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei
Iran's Chief Justice Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei

Top Iranian psychiatrists have protested rulings on two actresses who defied hijab, saying the diagnoses by the judiciary are unqualified.

Azadeh Samadi and Afsaneh Baygan were claimed to have "mental illness and anti-family personality" according to judges rather than mental health professionals after they were caught defying Iran's tough hijab laws.

Leading psychiatrists have said “the diagnosis of mental disorders falls squarely within the purview of psychiatrists, rather than judges.” They expressed deep concern about the language and rationale employed in the ruling, particularly in the context of diagnosing a condition termed "antisocial personality."

They have deemed the judges' conclusions "unscientific and strange," emphasizing that it is crucial for accurate psychiatric assessments to be conducted by qualified professionals in the field.

The campaign is being led between The Scientific Association of Psychiatrists, The Scientific Association of Psychosomatic Medicine, The Scientific Association of Psychotherapy, and the Psychological Association of Iran which published an open letter addressed to Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei, the Chief Justice, voicing their concerns and objections.

The associations underscore the necessity of avoiding the unwarranted labeling of individuals' behaviors with psychiatric diagnostic titles. Such an approach, they argue, “not only lacks scientific validity but also may result in exacerbating the stigma surrounding mental illnesses, leading people to be more reluctant in seeking essential mental health services.”

The two women now face imprisonment, a travel ban, and restrictions on using virtual platforms.

Banner

Most Viewed

After Muscat collapse, Tehran argues over what comes next
1
ANALYSIS

After Muscat collapse, Tehran argues over what comes next

2

Islamic Republic asks public to identify opponents abroad

3

Hormuz traffic plunges ahead of Iran-China talks

4

Xi’s BRICS peace call sparks debate in Iran over China’s role in war

5
INSIGHT

Tehran political circles see US hand in postponement of Oman Hormuz talks

Banner

Spotlight

  • From Halkbank to Golden Global: Iran sanctions and Turkey’s banking ties

    From Halkbank to Golden Global: Iran sanctions and Turkey’s banking ties

  • A generation shaped by Woman, Life, Freedom refuses to go back
    ANALYSIS

    A generation shaped by Woman, Life, Freedom refuses to go back

  • Mahsa Amini and the century-long struggle of Iranian women
    INSIGHT

    Mahsa Amini and the century-long struggle of Iranian women

  • ‘This is the cost you must pay’: Iran accused of denying food to death-row twin

    ‘This is the cost you must pay’: Iran accused of denying food to death-row twin

  • January's unfinished love stories: Lives severed by Iran protest killings

    January's unfinished love stories: Lives severed by Iran protest killings

  • After Muscat collapse, Tehran argues over what comes next
    ANALYSIS

    After Muscat collapse, Tehran argues over what comes next

Banner
Banner