Khamenei’s Man Says ‘Our War With The Enemy Is Permanent’

Mardo Soghom
Mardo Soghom

Chief Editor of Iran International English website

Hossein Shariatmadari, the hardline editor of the Kayhan newspaper, visiting Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei (left) at hospital in 2014
Hossein Shariatmadari, the hardline editor of the Kayhan newspaper, visiting Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei (left) at hospital in 2014

Our war against “the enemy” will end only if we give up real Islam, or if the United States gives up its animosity, an Iranian firebrand ideologue has said.

The man is Hossein Shariatmadari, a hardliner trusted by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and appointed by him to run the Kayhan Daily in Tehran, the regime’s most uncompromising media outlet.

While Shariatmadari can be regarded as an extremist who does not mince words and is less diplomatic than the 84-year-old autocrat who appointed him, his ideas cannot be dismissed. As long as Khamenei is alive, Shariatmadari’s words are closer to his thinking than what any Islamic Republic diplomat might say.

Addressing a congregation marking the death anniversary of an ayatollah assassinated four decades ago, Kayhan’s chief editor said that the kind of Islam the regime upholds is “not American Islam.” The difference between true Islam and ‘American Islam’, he claimed is pursuing justice. But for Khamenei justice means an unending war against Israel and the United States.

Any kind of Islam other than what Khamenei demands is fake according to the ideology of the Islamic Republic, which the aging autocrat defends with all the destructive means at his disposal. This was also in the heart of his animosity toward Saudi Arabia, which he many times described as a “corrupt” system because it cooperated with the United States, which protects Israel.

Shariatmadari said, “our war with the enemy is ever lasting and permanent, and we have achieved a lot from the beginning, but still have a long way to go.”

(From left to right) Foreign ministers/secretaries of state Wang Yi (China), Laurent Fabius (France), Frank-Walter Steinmeier (Germany), Federica Mogherini (EU), Mohammad Javad Zarif (Iran), Philip Hammond (UK), John Kerry (USA).
(From left to right) Foreign ministers/secretaries of state Wang Yi (China), Laurent Fabius (France), Frank-Walter Steinmeier (Germany), Federica Mogherini (EU), Mohammad Javad Zarif (Iran), Philip Hammond (UK), John Kerry (USA).

The Islamic regime has indeed armed and supported tens of thousands of militants throughout the region with the aim of defeating the United States and destroying Israel. It is also a few steps away from becoming a nuclear threshold state, if not outright producing nuclear weapons.

When President Barack Obama was crafting the JCPOA nuclear deal with Iran, his aides told the media that the President aimed higher than a nuclear deal. His ambitious goal was to use “the strategic opportunity” to try to convert Iran from foe to “friend”, as an influential media outlet put it at the time.

However, as soon as the deal was signed, the following year Iran’s Revolutionary Guard wrote ‘death to Israel’ on their missiles, and Obama had to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to get American hostages back.

In the approximately 18 months Obama was in office after the JCPOA was finalized in mid-2015, no strategic breakthrough took place. Iran got its billions from the deal and spent most of the money fueling the wars in Yemen, Syria and building up its proxy forces in Iraq, despite subtle hints of possible wider cooperation his diplomats gave during the nuclear talks.

The Biden administration after trying for two years to revive the JCPOA has apparently realized that Iran is not ready to play ball and is contemplating a limited agreement to nominally limit its nuclear program while the president fights for re-election.

But Khamenei is the one who defines the nature of US-Iranian relations. For him the concept of America and Israel being eternal enemies is almost sacred and he does not miss a chance to say so. On June 4, he once again revealed his lack of interest in any shift in policy, indirectly referring to a limited deal.

“Our young people should pay attention. The enmity of world arrogance will not disappear with tactical retrenchments. Some imagine that if we retreat on some issue, their enmity will decrease against us. This is a mistake.”