What Ordinary Iranians Say About Direct Talks With US
Maryam Sinaiee
Iran International
Except for the state-run broadcaster (IRIB), street interviews about controversial issues such as direct negotiations with the US are rare in Iranian media.
Iran International
Except for the state-run broadcaster (IRIB), street interviews about controversial issues such as direct negotiations with the US are rare in Iranian media.
But a reformist website, Ensaf News, on Friday published vox pops from several provinces and explained that due to media restrictions it has edited out some of the remarks.
The initiative is quite unique because when it comes to controversial matters, most news websites in Iran do not even allow readers to comment, or edit the comments before publishing, to prevent the closure of their publication by the authorities.
"What are they expecting to happen that they are dallying so much? Why are they delaying it when eventually they will accept to directly talk with the US? Why shouldn't we do it when we can live better if we make a deal with the US, so we won't need Russia and China?", Ensaf News quoted Sattar, a carpenter in Sabzevar in eastern Iran, as saying.
Mohammad-Hesam, a student at Khorasan seminary, told Ensaf News that direct negotiation with the US is banned by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei because it "entails many harms and no benefit at all." He added that if the US changes its “wolfish behavior” there will not be a problem to "negotiate with the enemy".
A professor of Tabriz University in northwestern Iran whose first name was not mentioned in the article noted the "bitter experience of the JCPOA" during which Iran and the US engaged in direct negotiations with Khamenei's permission, but former US president Donald Trump unilaterally left the deal. He said repetition of that experience is "not only stupid but also treachery". "Authorities should take action against those who still speak about this subject and sadly are not few even in universities," he added.
"The alternative to negotiation with the US is war with that country. Are we prepared for such a war? Even if we are militarily prepared, do we have enough financial resources for such a war? a lawyer in Ahvaz in the southwestern province of Khuzestan, told Ensaf News while Faezeh, a photographer in Tabriz, said what people think and want is clear. "But nobody cares what people want. They do whatever they please," she said.
"To resolve this issue, they must hold a referendum. The most peaceful and legal solution, as long as people and the authorities think differently, is to hold a referendum and let people's vote decide the matter. Rouhani spoke about holding a referendum a few times but did not follow it with action. There wouldn't be so many problems now if a referendum had been held about negotiations between Iran and the US," Saleh, a student at Isfahan University of Technology said according to Ensaf News.
A retired teacher in Isfahan, Nahid, argued that the US is a country like all other countries but has been unduly singled out. "In fact, Israelis hope for the enmity between Iran and the US to continue because it them who profit from it."
Conspiracy theories are abundant too. Mojtaba, a taxi driver in Mashhad, accused the government of secretly negotiating with the US. "The president's visit to Russia was to make a deal with Russia and the US [over Ukraine]. They don't announce it in order not to contradict themselves, otherwise, they have always negotiated behind the scenes and the rest is only a game because they don't want to tell people."
Some observers have expressed concern that the disappointing performance of Iran's 11th parliament (Majles) since the 1979 revolution might lead to another record voter low turnout in 2024. The parliament's performance already led to an extremely low turnout in the 2020 by-election.
Nearly under every social media post about the parliament, users point out that lawmakers have broken their promise of making the voting process in the parliament transparent. In early November, the parliament rejected a bill that called for open voting and a renewed push in February was supported by only 66 of the 290 lawmakers. However, the Majles might approve the bill towards the end of its term only to leave it as an annoying legacy for the next Majles.
While the current Majles started its work with criticism of the Rouhani administration's economic performance, it has not yet approved any bill meant to bring about improvement in Iran's ailing economy. Majles speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said in a rare admission in October, “We could not accomplish anything,” and added, “We were not able to work correctly.”
Meanwhile, in July 2021, Khabar Online, a leading news website in Tehran characterized the current Majles as a "minority parliament" that should avoid provocative legislation opposed by most Iranians. The website noted that the ultra-conservative parliament has already annoyed a major part of the population by considering a bill to limit citizens’ access to the Internet and opposing a long-awaited salary increase for the country's low-paid teachers who have been taking to the streets in recent months.
Khabar Online also said that 38 lawmakers at the Majles had won between 2 to 10 percent of the votes in their constituencies, when they got elected in February 2020. Two members won around 2 percent of the votes in their districts, while at least 3 lawmakers in this group chair various parliamentary committees despite their less than 10 percent voter base.
While at times the Majles joined other critics to lash out at the Raisi administration for nepotism and giving big jobs to small men with no merits, it turned out in November that some of the insiders who got the big jobs were the relatives of lawmakers.
The parliament has also been harshly criticized for not objecting to the appointment of IRGC generals as state officials or allowing them to run for President.
The Majles has also been criticized by the press for not being able to carry out its supervisory role. A group of lawmakers tabled motions during the past months to impeach several ministers including the ministers of labor, industry and health for breaking laws and shortcomings in their performance, but each time, the Majles Presidium refused to officially acknowledge the call for impeachment.
Based on what the Majles has done or failed to do during the past two years, some Iranian media outlets, including the moderate Rouydad24, have said that many of the current lawmakers might find it hard to convince Iranian voters to vote for them in 2024 when the turnout is likely to be even lower than in 2020.
The parliament’s record of coordination with the government has also been criticized. While most commentators in Iran believed that a hardliner Majles would work well with the ultraconservative government of Ebrahim Raisi, the first signs of a rift between the two emerged in late February as the parliament disagreed with key parts of the government's budget bill.