WSJ Calls On Biden Not To Agree To Iran Terms, Increase Pressure | Iran International

WSJ Calls On Biden Not To Agree To Iran Terms, Increase Pressure

In an Editorial Board opinion article, the Wall Street Journal has said that Iran’s demand to make a future withdrawal of the United States from a revived nuclear deal contingent on UN approval is unconstitutional.

The publication said that the Biden Administration in the pursuit of its goal to revive the 2015 nuclear accord (JCPOA) has already agreed to lift “its most powerful sanctions” but Iran is demanding more, including a US agreement “to a clause that makes American withdrawal from the deal contingent on United Nations approval.”

Former president Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew form the JCPOA in 2018 and Iran argues that if it makes a deal with the Biden Administration, there is no guarantee that a future US administration will not do the same.

But the Wall Street Journal says, “Iran doesn’t care, but such a clause is unconstitutional. A U.S. President can’t stop a future Congress or President from changing policy, especially when the nuclear agreement was never submitted to the Senate for ratification as a treaty.”

The Editorial Board argues that President Joe Biden would not submit a new deal to the Senate for ratification because he knows “it would be unlikely to get a simple majority, much less the two-thirds needed to ratify a treaty.” 

The opinion article concludes that Tehran drags out the negotiations, while it continues to ramp up its nuclear program. If the US administration is forced to abandon negotiations, it “would mean a return to Mr. Trump’s “maximum-pressure” sanctions campaign, which Biden officials criticized.”

It also argues that as protests increase in Iran, “the Biden Administration should be increasing pressure on the regime—not giving it an escape route.”

US lawmakers, mostly Republican, have already raised their voices against making concessions to Tehran and lifting sanctions that would give the Islamic Republic a financial lifeline and enable it to pursue its military and regional policies, such as its ballistic missile program and funding of allies and proxies in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen.

The Biden Administration has said that it first wants to revive the JCPOA to put Tehran’s nuclear program in a box and then negotiate about Iran’s ballistic missiles and its interventionist policies in the region. But critics say that a return to JCPOA and lifting of sanctions would remove all incentives for Tehran to agree on further talks.

Iranian officials have repeatedly said that multilateral talks in Vienna are limited to reviving the nuclear deal and they will not negotiate over other issues. Washington regional allies, Israel and Persian Gulf Arab states also demand a comprehensive deal and not just the revival of the Obama-era agreement.

Iran in Brief
The UN nuclear watchdog IAEA has said that Iran has not fully honored a deal it struck two weeks ago with the agency's director to allow monitoring work of its nuclear facilities to take place.More
Narges Mohammadi in an Instagram post Sunday said she has been summoned for the execution of a 30-month prison sentence and 80 lashes but will disobey the summons.More
A member of the Iranian parliament's Energy Committee says fuel shipments to Lebanon will be paid for and are "definitely not for free".More
A hardliner daily in Iran financed by the Supreme Leader's office has attacked a well-known university professor for criticizing the country’s nuclear negotiating position.More
Before leaving for the UN General Assembly, the Israeli prime minister called on Iran and the Palestinians to stop “obsessing” over Israel and focus on providing for their own people.More